Joseph Priestley
Priestley was born to an established English Dissenting family (i.e. they did
not conform to the Church of England) in Birstall, near Batley
in the West Riding of Yorkshire. He was the oldest of six children born to Mary Swift
and Jonas Priestley, a finisher of
cloth. To ease his mother's burdens, Priestley was sent to live with his
grandfather around the age of one. He returned home, five years later, after
his mother died. When his father remarried in 1741, Priestley went to live with
his aunt and uncle, the wealthy and childless Sarah and John Keighley, 3 miles
(4.8 km) from Fieldhead. Because Priestley was precocious—at the age of four he
could flawlessly recite all 107 questions and answers of the Westminster Shorter Catechism—his aunt sought the best education for the boy,
intending him for the ministry. During his youth, Priestley attended local
schools where he learned Greek, Latin, and Hebrew.
Discovery of
oxygen
In August 1774 he isolated an
"air" that appeared to be completely new, but he did not have an
opportunity to pursue the matter because he was about to tour Europe with
Shelburne. While in Paris, however, Priestley managed to replicate the experiment
for others, including French chemist Antoine Lavoisier. After returning to Britain in January 1775, he
continued his experiments and discovered "vitriolic acid air" (sulphur dioxide, SO2).
In March he wrote to several
people regarding the new "air" that he had discovered in August. One
of these letters was read aloud to the Royal Society, and a paper outlining the discovery, titled "An
Account of further Discoveries in Air", was published in the Society's
journal Philosophical Transactions. Priestley called the new substance
"dephlogisticated air", which he made in the famous experiment by focusing the sun's rays on a sample of mercuric oxide. He first tested it on mice, who surprised him by
surviving quite a while entrapped with the air, and then on himself, writing
that it was "five or six times better than common air for the purpose of
respiration, inflammation, and, I believe, every other use of common
atmospherically air". He had discovered oxygen gas
(O2).
Volume I of Experiments and Observations on Different Kinds of Air outlined several discoveries: "nitrous air" (nitric
oxide, NO); "vapor of spirit of
salt", later called "acid air" or "marine acid air" (anhydrous hydrochloric acid, HCl); "alkaline air" (ammonia, NH3); "diminished" or "dephlogisticated
nitrous air" (nitrous oxide,
N2O); and, most famously, "dephlogisticated air" (oxygen, O2) as well as experimental findings that showed plants
revitalised enclosed volumes of air, a discovery that would eventually lead to
the discovery of photosynthesis.
Priestley also developed a "nitrous air test" to determine the
"goodness of air". Using a pneumatic trough, he would mix
nitrous air with a test sample, over water or mercury, and measure the decrease
in volume—the principle of eudiometry. After a small history of the study of airs, he
explained his own experiments in an open and sincere style. As an early
biographer writes, "whatever he knows or thinks he tells: doubts,
perplexities, blunders are set down with the most refreshing candour."
Priestley also described his cheap and easy-to-assemble experimental apparatus;
his colleagues therefore believed that they could easily reproduce his
experiments. Faced with inconsistent experimental results, Priestley employed
phlogiston theory. This, however, led him to conclude that there were only
three types of "air": "fixed", "alkaline", and
"acid". Priestley dismissed the burgeoning chemistry of his day. Instead, he focused on gases and
"changes in their sensible properties", as had natural philosophers
before him. He isolated carbon monoxide (CO), but
apparently did not realise that it was a separate "air".
In 1777, Antoine Lavoisier had written Mémoire sur la combustion en général, the first of what proved to be a series of attacks on phlogiston theory; it was against
these attacks that Priestley responded in 1783. While Priestley accepted parts
of Lavoisier's theory, he was unprepared to assent to the major revolutions
Lavoisier proposed: the overthrow of phlogiston, a chemistry based conceptually
on elements and compounds, and a new chemical nomenclature. Priestley's original experiments on
"dephlogisticated air" (oxygen), combustion, and water provided
Lavoisier with the data he needed to construct much of his system; yet
Priestley never accepted Lavoisier's new theories and continued to defend
phlogiston theory for the rest of his life. Lavoisier's system was based
largely on the quantitative
concept that mass is neither created nor destroyed in chemical reactions
(i.e., the conservation of mass). By contrast, Priestley preferred to observe qualitative changes in heat, color, and particularly volume. His
experiments tested "airs" for "their solubility in water, their
power of supporting or extinguishing flame, whether they were respirable, how
they behaved with acid and alkaline air, and with nitric oxide and inflammable
air, and lastly how they were affected by the electric spark.
No comments:
Post a Comment